Technology Development Resources
Diagnostics Research and Development Resources
Human Specimen Resources
Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Biobanking in Cancer Research
Invited Speakers
Luis Alberto Diaz, Jr, M.D.
Associate Professor of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University
Dr. Luis Diaz is a leading authority in oncology, having pioneered several genomic diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for cancer. He is an attending physician at the Johns Hopkins Hospital where he specializes in the treatment of pancreatic and colorectal cancers. He is currently a member of the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics where he directs translational medicine and is the Director of the Swim Across America Lab. Dr. Diaz has undergraduate and medical degrees from the University of Michigan, and completed residency training at the Osler Medical Service at Johns Hopkins and medical oncology training at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins.
Maximilian Diehn MD, PhD.
Assistant Professor of Radiology Oncology Stanford University
Dr. Diehn is an Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology at Stanford University, with co-appointments in the Cancer Institute and Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. He is a board certified Radiation Oncologist and specializes in the treatment of lung cancers. Dr. Diehn’s current research program spans laboratory, translational, and clinical studies. His areas of interest include cancer genomics, stem cell biology, and lung cancer biology. His group has developed an ultrasensitive and specific method for detection of circulating tumor DNA called Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). Current work is focused on applying CAPP-Seq to a range of tumor types and clinical contexts, with a particular emphasis on analyses of tumor heterogeneity and detection of minimal residual disease. He received his Bachelor’s Degree in Biochemical Sciences from Harvard College and his M.D./Ph.D. in Biophysics from Stanford University.
Peter Kuhn, PhD.
Dean’s Professor of Biological Sciences and Professor of Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California
Dr. Kuhn is a scientist and entrepreneur with a career long commitment in personalized medicine and individualized patient care. He is focused on the redesign of cancer care. Dr. Kuhn is the Dean’s Professor of Biological Sciences and Professor of Medicine and Engineering at USC, a founding member of the Michelson Center for Convergent Biosciences, a co-founder of the BRIDGE @ USC and director of the Southern California Physics Oncology Center. Prof. Kuhn’s strategy is to advance our understanding of the human body to improve the human condition. His research is shedding new light at how cancer spreads through the body. This new science will lead to a personalized care strategy that is biologically informed and clinically actionable. Dr. Kuhn is a physicist who trained initially at the Julius Maximilians Universität Würzburg, Germany, before receiving his Masters in Physics at the University of Albany, Albany, NY in 1993 and his Ph.D. in 1995. He then moved to Stanford University where he later joined the faculties of Medicine and Accelerator Physics. From 2002 to 2014 he established a translational science program at the Scripps Research in La Jolla, CA that brought together over forty scientists from basic, engineering and medical sciences to work on understanding the spread of cancer in the human body. He has published over 200 peer scientific articles and patents as a result of his research. He founded Epic Sciences, Inc. in 2009 to develop cancer diagnostic products. Today Epic Sciences is a premier partner to most pharmaceutical and biotech companies in the development of precision companion diagnostics for cancer care. The University of Southern California (USC) recruited Dr. Kuhn in 2014 to advance the next frontier of human scale science that can improve the human condition. At the convergence of biological, engineering and medical sciences will we learn how major diseases from cancer to neurodegenerative to autoimmune diseases evolve in and how we can improve the outcomes for patients.
Tony E. Godfrey, PhD
Associate Chair, Surgical Research and Associate Professor of Surgery, Boston University
Dr. Godfrey earned a bachelor’s of science degree in biochemistry from Brunel University in England, followed by a doctorate in molecular biology and biochemistry, also from Brunel. He attended the University of California, San Francisco, for postdoctoral fellowships and managed UCSF’s Genome Analysis Core Facility before taking his first faculty position at the University of Pittsburgh in 1999. Dr. Godfrey’s research is focused on cancer genetics and molecular pathology. Research projects use state-of-the-art genetic and genomic approaches to address clinical needs in the areas of cancer diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Currently the major focus of Dr. Godfrey’s research is on Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma; a tumor with rapidly increasing incidence in the United States and other western countries. The Godfrey lab works closely with translational research teams comprised of surgeons, pathologists and oncologists in order to develop new molecular approaches to cancer detection, staging and treatment.
Abstract Title: Detection of Tumor-specific Mutations in Circulating, Cell-free DNA: Potential for a Biomarker in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recent studies have shown that tumor-specific DNA from multiple types of tumors can be detected circulating in plasma and this has raised the possibility of “liquid biopsies” using mutated tumor DNA as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. Detection of mutations with allele frequencies below 0.1% remains challenging however given that circulating cell-free DNA is highly degraded and in low abundance. Detection of multiple different mutations in the same sample presents an additional challenge particularly when the mutation panel may change from patient to patient. We have developed a novel approach, called SimSen-Seq, to introduce molecular barcodes into sequencing libraries with DNA inputs as low as 5ng. Barcodes enable differentiation of true mutants from background noise introduced by Taq polymerase errors and permits detection of variant alleles with frequencies below 0.1%. The barcodes are protected from mis-priming using a hairpin structure which permits a high degree of multiplexing and flexibility for detection of multiple mutations from one plasma sample. We are using this technology to test the utility of liquid biopsy as a biomarker for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) diagnosis and disease monitoring.
Tza-Huei (Jeff) Wang
Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University
Dr. Wang’s primary research focus is the development of new technologies and methods for molecular analysis of diseases and biomedical research via advances in micro- and nano-scale sciences. He has contributed to developments in single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy, microfluidics and nano-biosensors for genetic and epigenetic biomarker-based diagnostics of cancer, infectious disease and an array of other diseases. Wang also has taken the leading role in the development of quantum dot-fluorescence resonance energy transfer (QD-FRET) DNA nanosensors, which have been used to detect a variety of cancer biomarkers, including point mutations, DNA methylation and gene copy variations in clinical laboratories. In addition, he has pioneered the development of single molecule detection (SMD) technologies for biomarker screening. Wang is an inventor of 20 patents, and has authored > 150 research articles and delivered > 90 invited talks. He received the NSF CAREER Award in 2006, CSR Jorge Heller Award in 2007, ASGR Excellence in Research Award in 2007, JALA Ten Award in 2011, JHU Discover Award in 2015 and several Best Paper Awards in technical conferences and workshops.
Abstract Title: Translating Nanotechnology and Microfluidics for Analysis of DNA Methylation
Tumorigenesis is a multi-step process resulting from gain-of-function or loss-of-function alterations, occurring through genetic or epigenetic abnormalities. The most well-studied epigenetic alteration is the transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressor genes associated with aberrant CpG DNA hypermethylation of gene promoter regions. Numerous reports demonstrate promoter hypermethylation as a promising biomarker for different types of cancer. The use of tumor-specific methylated circulating DNA as a biomarker is particularly attractive for cancer screening and companion diagnostics, as blood is obtained through a simple, relatively noninvasive procedure. While promising, reliable detection of methylation as marker is hampered by the limited quantity of circulating DNA in blood. This talk describes the development of new technology platforms using micro and nanotechnologies to enhance the both the sample preparation and detection sensitivity for analyzing circulating methylated DNA. Examples includes the use of the quantum dot (QD)-FRET technology to improve the limit of detection and the use of combined digital detection and high precision melt analysis to distinguish individual copies of epiallelic species at single-CpG-site resolution. The talk also describes a silica superparamagnetic particles-based single-tube sample preparation process that enhances the efficiency of recovery of circulating DNA and subsequent bisulfite conversion. The streamlined process has led to the development of a microfluidic droplet platform of sample preparation that promises for robust DNA methylation analysis in the point of care settings.
Julie E. Lang, MD, FACS
Director, USC Breast Cancer Program
Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Southern California
Julie Lang, MD, FACS is an Associate Professor at the Keck School of Medicine of USC. She earned her medical degree from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. She then went on to complete a Surgery residency and a postdoctoral research fellowship in breast cancer research at the University of California, San Francisco. She completed her breast surgical oncology fellowship at the UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2007. She served as the Director of Breast Surgical Oncology at the Arizona Cancer Center for 5 years, then joined the faculty of USC in 2012. Dr. Lang is an expert in the field of breast surgical oncology, with strong expertise in both clinical care and research in the field of breast cancer. She is experienced with advanced breast surgical techniques, such as skin sparing, nipple sparing mastectomies, and coordinating reconstructive surgery with colleagues in Plastic Surgery. Her research focuses, clinical trials, locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancer and radiation-induced sarcoma. Dr. Lang is an avid breast cancer researcher and leads the Breast Surgical Oncology Translational Research Laboratory at the Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. Dr. Lang is very patient centered and strives to utilize technology and evidenced based medicine to the benefit of her patients. She has published numerous peer reviewed articles and book chapters on the topic of breast cancer.
Abstract Title: Advantages and Disadvantages of ctDNA vs CTC Assays
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) assays have each been demonstrated to be prognostic in breast cancer. CTCs and ctDNA research have made great progress demonstrating correlation with clinical grade biomarkers/tumor growth and sequencing of tumors. There is a compelling case for studying these circulating biomarkers to predict treatment response. Specific advantages and disadvantages for applying these two types of liquid biopsies towards prospective translational studies will be discussed.
Geoffrey R. Oxnard, MD.
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Dr. Oxnard is a thoracic oncologist at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. He is a clinic-based translational investigator whose research focuses on the development of biomarkers and targeted therapies for management of genotype-defined NSCLC populations and drug resistance. He was previously awarded with a Young Investigator Award and Career Development Award from the Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO, a Career Development Award from the US Department of Defense, and has recently been named a Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator. He leads or co-leads a number of ongoing correlative studies including the NCI’s ALCHEMIST study aiming to genomically characterize resected NSCLC, the INHERIT EGFR study of germline EGFR T790M mutations, and the FNIH VOL-PACT study of advanced imaging metrics for efficient clinical trial design.
Katherine Varley, PhD
Assistant Professor, Oncological Sciences, University of Utah
Katherine (K-T) Varley, PhD, is an investigator at Huntsman Cancer Institute and an assistant professor in the Department of Oncological Sciences at the University of Utah. Dr. Varley’s research focuses on using next-generation sequencing assays and computational analyses to study the gene expression, transcription factor binding and DNA methylation patterns in breast cancer. Her goals are to answer fundamental questions about how epigenetic gene regulation is disrupted in cancer cells as well as to discover drug targets and biomarkers that may have a more immediate impact on breast cancer treatment. Research in her lab involves the development of new molecular methods and bioinformatics approaches to explore the cancer genome and to translate discoveries into clinical tools that improve patient care. Recently Dr. Varley’s lab has modified the targeted sequencing method she developed, called Patch PCR, in order to quantify low frequency mutations and DNA methylation. They are applying this approach to measure rare circulating tumor DNA molecules in blood plasma from breast cancer patients
Abstract Title: Patch PCR: A targeted sequencing approach to quantify breast cancer ctDNA
Monitoring for disease recurrence is an essential component of the clinical management of breast cancer. Approximately 1.5 million breast cancer survivors will see their oncologists for follow-up physical exams and imaging tests this year. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for non-invasive monitoring for breast cancer recurrence because it can be detected early, several months before imaging-based detection of metastasis. Additionally, tumor mutations that confer resistance to hormone therapy can be detected in ctDNA, which can help inform treatment decisions. Our goal is to develop a clinical-scale ctDNA test that can be used to monitor breast cancer patients for disease recurrence and determine if a recurrent tumor is resistant to hormone therapy. Several years ago we developed Patch PCR, a method for targeted sequencing that utilizes thermo-stable ligation and PCR to capture up to 1,000 targeted loci in parallel for sequencing on next-generation instruments. Recently, we have enhanced Patch PCR by incorporating unique molecule indexes during the ligation-based capture, which enables the accurate quantification of rare ctDNA molecules in cell free DNA isolated from blood plasma. We designed a breast cancer mutation panel that covers enough loci so that ctDNA from most patients’ tumors can be detected. We have also designed a breast cancer DNA methylation panel, which enables the quantification of ctDNA based upon the detection of breast cancer-specific DNA methylation patterns. We have reduced the cost, time, and complexity of the test so that it can be performed routinely and reliably in a CLIA laboratory environment. We will describe the development, evaluation, and optimization of these tests.
Muhammed Murtaza MD, PhD
Translational Genomics Research Institute, Mayo Clinic Arizona
Dr. Muhammed Murtaza received his medical degree from Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan before moving to Trinity College and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute to get a PhD from the University of Cambridge. He started his research career investigating germline determinants of disease predisposition in South Asians before moving into development of cancer diagnostics through cell-free DNA analysis. He moved to Arizona in 2014 as Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Center for Noninvasive Diagnostics at TGen and Mayo Clinic Arizona, where he setup a research program focused on liquid biopsies for patients with cancer. Dr. Murtaza’s current research focuses on developing novel methods to leverage circulating tumor DNA analysis as a longitudinal diagnostic tool for patients with localized and metastatic cancers.
Abstract Title: Capturing tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution using ctDNA analysis
ctDNA analysis is moving rapidly towards clinical applications such as noninvasive tumor genotyping, re-biopsies and monitoring of treatment response. However, there is little evidence evaluating the extent of tumor heterogeneity that can be captured in plasma DNA and we don't yet understand how to make sense of discordant results between plasma and tumor samples. In this talk, I will share insights gained from targeted and exome-wide comparisons between tumor biopsies and longitudinal plasma samples in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.
Jamie Holloway, PhD
Breast cancer Survivor, patient Advocate
As a graduate student at Georgetown University, Jamie Holloway studied breast cancer progression while gaining an appreciation for the impact of research on patients. Nearly ten years after earning her PhD, she was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. Following treatment and with no evidence of disease, she now provides a patient’s perspective to researchers as a member of Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates and bridges the gap between scientists and patients as a Precision Medicine Advocate for Cure Forward and the Patient Advocate for the Metastatic Breast Cancer Project at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Abstract Title: Patient advocacy perspective in the use of ctDNA in clinical trials and beyond
This talk will focus on the patient’s perspective of the utilization of ctDNA in the clinical trials process and beyond, into clinical practice. Specifically, the need to validate the procedure will be discussed, as will some problems that may be encountered. Significant benefits of utilizing ctDNA within the scope of a clinical trial will be considered, and additional discussion will focus on patient benefits that can be derived from the incorporation of this technology into the standard of care. Furthermore, the promise for the use of ctDNA in the monitoring of disease progression in the in-treatment and the NED populations will be explored.
Theresa Zhang, PhD
Vice President, Research Services, Personal Genome Diagnostics
Dr. Theresa Zhang joined PGDx after a decade at Merck Research Laboratories, where she led the molecular profiling group supporting Oncology drug development at all stages. During her tenure at Merck, Dr. Zhang oversaw large scale efforts for identifying patient selection biomarkers, advanced multiple candidate biomarkers for clinical validation and led the development of specially designed CLIA assays for use in cancer clinical trials. Dr. Zhang received B.S. degrees from Peking University and Bridgewater College and a Ph.D. from the University of Virginia. She completed a Post-doctoral Fellowship in bioinformatics at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. Dr. Zhang is a co-author of numerous scientific publications and a frequent presenter at scientific meetings.
Kelli Bramlett
Director, R&D, Thermo Fisher Scientific
Kelli Bramlett leads a team of scientists in the Clinical Sequencing Division of Life Sciences Solutions, Thermo Fisher Scientific. She guides the Research and Development effort focused on creating innovation sequencing and data analysis solutions for cfDNA analysis and liquid biopsy with next generation sequencing. The team has also developed many sequencing products and applications for RNA analysis using next generation sequencing. Prior to joining Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ms. Bramlett was a drug development scientist at Ely Lilly and Company where she led a team of scientists specializing in gene regulation and nuclear receptor biology to identify novel drug targets. Ms. Bramlett built her background and experience in gene regulation through prior academic positions at Baylor College of Medicine and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Kelli holds an undergraduate degree in Chemistry from Rice University in Houston, TX and a Master’s Degree in Pharmacology from Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, IN.
Abstract Title: Oncomine™ cfDNA Assays — experiences in development and technical validation
Ms. Bramlett will present work done to develop the new Oncomine cfDNA assays for research use in detecting somatic variation from cfDNA. The focus will be on the technology utilized in these new targeted sequencing methods as well as the testing used to technically validate these research materials. She will also present some results from clinical research samples and discuss the early customer experience.
Travis Clark, PhD
Principal Scientist, Molecular Biology and Sequencing, Foundation Medicine.
Dr. Clark received his PhD at the University of Toronto and post doctoral training at Yale University. He took his first position in industry as a senior scientist at RainDance Technologies developing genomics assays on their microfluidic, digital droplet based platform. He then moved to be on the founding team of Ion Torrent Systems as a Senior Research Scientist and was on the team that developed a new next-gen sequencing instrument, the Personal Genome Machine. He went to Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Vanderbilt University Medical Center as the Technical Director of the Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics center. In 2014Dr. Clark joined Foundation Medicine on the Molecular Biology and Sequencing to lead a lab team focused on taking the circulating tumor DNA assay through feasibility, development, analytical validation, and commercial launch.
Abstract Title: Development of a Clinical Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Cancer Molecular Profiling
Dr. Clark will be presenting a brief introduction on the clinical requirements (genomic alterations, sample types, accuracy specifications) that led to the assay requirements and design. He will also discuss the design and result of their analytical validation of the ctDNA assay, with focus on precision, accuracy, and orthogonal validation.
Martin Horlitz
Manager Molecular Diagnostic Development, Qiagen
Dr. Horlitz has been working with QIAGEN since 2007 and is currently the head of the Liquid Biopsy competence center within the Technology Center Diagnostic Sample Preparation & Stabilization (part of QIAGEN’s MDx R&D organization). He earned a masters in biology and a PhD in Physical and Molecular Biology from the University of Düsseldorf, Germany. Before coming to QIAGEN, Dr. Horlitz was doing a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford University School of Medicine (basic research work on eukaryotic translation using single-molecule techniques). His major fields of expertise at QIAGEN include:
- Extraction of circulating nucleic acids from plasma and serum for applications in prenatal diagnosis and cancer detection ("Liquid Biopsy")
- Stabilization technologies for circulating nucleic acids in blood in clinical workflows "between blood draw and nucleic acid extraction"
- Viral nucleic acid extraction for diagnostic applications.
- Automated pre-analytical workflows for NGS, including liquid biopsy analysis
- Development of manual and automated nucleic acid purification solutions under Design Control, as required for IVD application development
Dr. Horlitz will present their technological approaches and solutions for blood sample stabilization and manual/automated ccfDNA extraction for molecular diagnostic workflows. This will include showing the importance of pre-analytical steps (i.e., sample stabilization and DNA isolation) to ensure accurate results for rapidly expanding ccfDNA applications in cancer profiling and detection alongside the application of ccfDNA-based testing in noninvasive prenatal diagnostics.
Reena Philip, PhD
Division Director, CDRH/OIR/DMGP, FDA
Dr. Philip currently holds the position of Director in the Division of Molecular Genetics and Pathology in the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices and Radiological Health, at Center for Devices and Radiologic Health at the FDA. At the FDA, she has been involved in many diverse activities including premarket clearance/approval, manufacturer assistance, post market regulatory compliance actions, and the development of FDA Guidance on In Vitro Companion Diagnostic Devices. In addition, she has been an ongoing participant in FDA multi-center reviews in companion diagnostics. Dr. Philip received her Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Abstract Title: Regulatory considerations: cfDNA IVD as a companion diagnostic
As a noninvasive means to detect genetic alterations in tumor DNA, detection of cell-free tumor DNA in plasma holds much promise for improving cancer diagnosis, monitoring and drug development. Recently The US Food and Drug Administration approved first blood test to detect gene mutation associated with non-small cell lung cancer as a companion diagnostic for the cancer drug Tarceva (erlotinib). Even though FDA approved one liquid biopsy test for lung cancer, there are still lots of challenges in advancing additional liquid biopsy cancer tests. This talk will cover some of these challenges & developments regarding the analytical and clinical validation of liquid biopsy cancer tests.
Lisa M McShane, PhD
Chief of the Biostatistics Branch, Biometric Research Program
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD), National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Dr. McShane advises programs in DCTD and NCI on matters relating to development and use of tumor markers for prognosis, therapy selection, and disease monitoring. She holds a Ph.D. in Statistics from Cornell University and is a Fellow of the American Statistical Association. Her statistical research interests include biomarker-driven clinical trial design, analysis methods for high-dimensional omics data, multiple comparisons methods, surrogate endpoints, measurement error adjustment methods, and biomarker assay analytical performance assessment. She co-led efforts to develop “Reporting guidelines for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK)” and "Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials." She is a coauthor of numerous statistical and biomedical papers and the book Statistical Design and Analysis of DNA Microarray Investigations. Dr. McShane serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Science Translational Medicine and is a member of the Editorial Board for BMC Medicine. She has served on several American Society of Clinical Oncology panels and committees, including those that developed guidelines for HER2 and hormone receptor testing in breast cancer, EGFR mutation testing in lung cancer, and use of tumor biomarkers in early stage breast cancer. She has served as a member of the Institute of Medicine Committee for Management of the Air Force Health Study Data and Specimens, the Consensus Committee on Management of the Air Force Health Study Data and Specimens-Report to Congress, and the Committee on the State of the Science in Ovarian Cancer Research.
Abstract Title: Statistical Considerations for Trials Designed to Determine Clinical Utility of cfDNA Assays
Advances in technologies to detect cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma, serum or other body fluids have generated interest in using these assays as clinical tools for early detection or diagnosis of cancer, and for assessing prognosis, selecting therapy, and monitoring tumor status before, during or after delivery of anti-cancer therapy. Advancement from proof-of-principle studies which demonstrate associations between presence of cfDNA and various clinical endpoints to demonstration that a cfDNA-based test has clinical utility, meaning that its use in clinical practice leads to net benefit for patients, requires appropriately designed clinical studies.
This talk will focus on statistical design principles for clinical studies which aim to establish that a cfDNA test has clinical utility when intended for use in one of three ways: assessing prognosis, selection of therapy, or disease monitoring. General initial considerations include the intended clinical use setting, analytical performance of the specific test to be used, how the test results will be interpreted, and how those results will be used to guide clinical decisions. Statistical design issues common to all three clinical uses include selection of cutpoints for clinical decisions, and consideration of whether the test is proposed as a standalone test absent availability of an alternative test, to replace an existing test, or to use in combination with an existing test. Additional considerations discussed for prognostic test utility evaluation are the distinction between relative and absolute risks, how they are influenced by characteristics of the intended use population, and whether there are therapies available to improve outcome. For assessment of a test’s utility for therapy selection different study designs may be considered depending on the preliminary level of evidence supporting the association between the target DNA alteration(s) and the therapies of interest, but usually some treatment randomization will be required to distinguish prognostic and predictive effects on time-to-event outcomes. Many of the considerations for design of clinical studies to assess a test’s utility in monitoring overlap with those for therapy selection, although timing of the testing occasions and the possibility to monitor for indicators of therapy resistance as well as sensitivity add complexity to the decision making process and study design. Carefully designed clinical studies taking into account all of the aspects discussed and tailored to the specific intended use will be essential to the successful translation of these promising new cfDNA technologies to clinical tests with established medical utility.
Paul “Mickey” Williams, PhD
Director, Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research
Dr. Williams received his doctorate from the University of Virginia, and did postdoctoral work at Stanford University. He spent thirteen years at Genentech, where he developed novel assays to support clinical studies and discover new therapeutic targets and contributed to the development of “real-time” PCR technology. Prior to joining CDP in 2010, he was a senior research group leader at Roche Molecular Diagnostics, managing two large multi-national clinical assay studies: The MILE Study (microarray innovations in leukemia) and a collaboration with the LLMPP (leukemia and lymphoma molecular profiling project) and also led projects that led to two FDA approved companion diagnostic tests. In his current position he continues to make contributions to the use of molecular technologies for use as clinical assays
Christopher D. Gocke, M.D.
Associate Professor of Pathology, Director of Molecular Pathology Division, Johns Hopkins University
Dr. Christopher Gocke is an Associate Professor of Pathology and Oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. He is Director of the Division of Molecular Pathology, Deputy Director (Vice Chairman) of Personalized Medicine for the Department of Pathology, and co-director of Johns Hopkins Genomics.He received his M.D. in 1985 from Rutgers Medical School. His residency training in pathology was at the University of Rochester and Stanford University. He completed a fellowship in pathology at Stanford. Dr. Gocke has co-authored over 100 peer-reviewed publications in the area of cancer diagnostics. He is a past Councilor on the Program Directors’ Council of the Association of Molecular Pathology and a member of the NCI’s Investigational Drug Steering Committee. He is co-principle investigator on two NIH research project cooperative agreements. He is board certified in Molecular Genetic Pathology and Anatomic Pathology.
Abstract Title: Challenges for the validation of ctDNA for use in clinical trials
Dr. Christopher Gocke, will speak on “Challenges for the validation of ctDNA for use in clinical trials”. He is director of the Division of Molecular Pathology and an associate professor of pathology and oncology at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. He will provide a brief historical overview of ctDNA, discuss some of the limitations of ctDNA assays reported to date, and provide suggestions to overcome validation issues in ctDNA testing.
Shivaani Kummar, MD, FACP
Director, Phase I Clinical Research Program, Division of Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine
Upon completing her medical degree from Lady Hardinge Medical College in New Delhi, India, Dr. Kummar moved to the United States to train in Internal Medicine at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Following this she was selected to pursue her fellowship training at the National Institutes of Health in Medical Oncology and Hematology, which culminated in her being offered a faculty position at Yale University, New Haven CT. After spending four years as Assistant Professor of Medicine at Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, she moved back to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, as staff clinician in the Developmental Therapeutics Section. She developed a clinical research program in novel cancer therapeutics and in 2011 became Head of Early Clinical Trials Development in the Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI. She moved to Stanford University in 2015 as Professor of Medicine, Director of the Phase I Clinical Research Program, and Chair of the Translational Oncology Program at Stanford, Stanford Cancer Institute. Her research interests focus on developing novel therapies for cancer. She specializes in conducting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic driven first-in-human trials tailored to make early, informed decisions regarding novel molecular agents. The clinical studies integrate genomics and laboratory correlates into early phase trials. She serves on multiple national and international committees and her work has been published in numerous peer reviewed journals.
Abstract Title: Role of Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Cancer Management
Increasing application of molecular profiling in the selection of cancer treatment, especially in diseases such as lung cancer, has highlighted the need to safely and repeatedly obtain tumor DNA samples throughout the disease course. The ability to isolate tumor DNA from blood presents a safe, simple method that lends itself to longitudinal assessments. Circulating tumor DNA analysis is being studied as a means to detect recurrence, assess tumor burden, determine early response, and to evaluate emergence of resistance. More data needs to be generated to correlate findings in circulating tumor DNA with those obtained from actual tumor biopsies and the overall clinical utility of this approach needs to established. Ongoing studies will better define the role of circulating tumor DNA profiling in cancer management.
David Polsky, MD, PHD
Professor of Dermatologic Oncology, Director of the Pigmented Lesion of the Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine
Dr. David Polsky is the Alfred W. Kopf MD Professor of Dermatologic Oncology, Director of the Pigmented Lesion Clinic in The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, and member of The Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at the New York University School of Medicine Langone Medical Center. He graduated cum laude from Bucknell University, received his MD and PhD degrees from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, completed his medical internship at Montefiore Medical Center, and his Dermatology training at NYU. He subsequently completed a post-doctoral fellowship in the Division of Molecular Pathology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and then returned to NYU to establish a melanoma translational research laboratory. As a physician-scientist, Dr. Polsky’s laboratory is focused primarily on biomarker research. In particular the lab is interested in the development of blood-based markers to monitor melanoma disease activity; the identification of patients with loco-regional melanoma who are at high risk for developing metastases; and the development of genetic approaches to identify patients at increased risk of developing melanoma. Dr. Polsky’s primary clinical interests are melanoma and atypical nevi.
Abstract Title: Utility of ctDNA monitoring in metastatic melanoma disease surveillance
While several highly effective immune checkpoint blocking agents and small molecule inhibitors of the mitogen activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are now available for metastatic melanoma, strategies for changing therapies in patients with progressing disease are not established. Currently there is no clinically useful blood-based biomarker to guide patient management. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is part of the melanoma staging system, and is the only serologic marker used for monitoring advanced melanoma in the United States; however, its sensitivity and specificity to detect disease progression are low. Unlike the management of asymptomatic patients with prostate, ovarian, colon, and breast cancer, where serial measurements of serologic markers are the mainstay of follow-up, in melanoma radiologic imaging studies are obtained every 3 to 6 months in asymptomatic patients with metastatic disease since LDH is not a sufficiently useful biomarker. This talk will describe our work investigating droplet digital PCR measurements of cell-free, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as biomarkers of disease activity in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing treatment with MAPK-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint blocking agents.
Gary Spitzer, MD
Director Clinical Validity and Clinical Utility Evaluation MolDx Palmetto GBA
Dr. Gary Spitzer presently evaluates the clinical utility of precision medicine testing for potential full coverage or possible coverage with data development under the requirement of a well-designed, prospectively developed outcome protocol and associated registry or trial. He is a Medical Oncologist by training. He graduated medical school in Melbourne Australia and received his medical oncology training and clinical research experience at MD Anderson Hospital Houston Texas. His present interests focus on the evidence-based clinical utility of precision medicine tests, and particularly cell-free DNA and other liquid biopsies techniques.
Abstract Title: Clinical Utility Needs of ctDNA Assays Versus Research Utility
This presentation will focus on the design of prospective transparent registries to validate the clinical utility of a test in a clear intent to study patient population. He will also discuss obstacles of existing registries and trial design and present ideas on how costs can be diminished through non-traditional data extraction techniques, but with an emphasis on transparency, scientific independence, and open data collection. The presentation will also address concerns regarding discordant liquid and tissue results from a clinical perspective and discuss possible methods to solve these concerns with data collection. These findings, are not uncommon with mutations derived under drug pressure. Although these findings are probably real, secondary to tumor heterogeneity, they may be best described as a clonally insignificant false positive. Where is the right balance between sensitivity and relevance when used to direct clinical decisions? Can we agree on performance guidelines, so no patient harm occurs Determining clinical utility will require a separate evaluation of this subgroup of patients?
David Wong, DMD, DMSc.
Professor, Associate Dean for Research, UCLA
Dr. Wong is Felix & Mildred Yip Endowed Professor, Associate Dean of Research and Director of the Oral/Head and Neck Oncology Research Center at UCLA. Dr. Wong is an active scientist in oral cancer and saliva diagnostics research. He has authored over 280 peer reviewed scientific publications. He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences (AAAS), past member of the ADA Council of Scientific Affairs and the past president of American Association of Dental Research (AADR).
Abstract Title: EFIRM Liquid Biopsy (eLB)
Liquid biopsy is a rapidly emerging field to address this unmet clinical need as diagnostics based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be a surrogate for the tumor genome. The use of ctDNA via liquid biopsy will facilitate analysis of tumor genomics that is urgently needed for molecular targeted therapy. Currently, most targeted approaches are based on PCR and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) for liquid biopsy applications with performance concordance in the 70-80% range with biopsy-based genotyping.
We have developed a liquid biopsy technology “Electric Field Induced Release and Measurement (EFIRM)- Liquid Biopsy (eLB)” provides the most accurate detection that can assist clinical treatment decisions for the most common subtype of lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that can extend the disease progress free survival period of these patients. eLB can detection ctDNA at single copy level. In addition eLB requires only 40 μl of sample volume, no sample processing, reaction time is 15min and can be performed at the point-of-care or high throughput reference lab using plasma or saliva. In two blinded independent clinical studies, eLB detects actionable EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients with >90% concordance with biopsy-based genotyping (1, 2). eLB is minimally/ non-invasive detecting the most common EGFR gene mutations that are treatable with TKI such as Gefitinib or Erlotinib to effectively extend the progression free survival of lung cancer patients (3). eLB offers both a high throughput reference lab as well as point-of-care platform that can provide real time feedback in a physician’s office.
- D. Pu et al., Evaluation of a novel saliva-based EGFR mutation detection for lung cancer: a pilot study. Thoracic Cancer, 1-8 (2016).
- F. Wei et al., Noninvasive saliva-based EGFR gene mutation detection in patients with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190, 1117-1126 (2014).
- L. M. Sholl et al., Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society. Arch Pathol Lab Med, (2016).
Nitzan Rosenfeld, PhD
Senior Group Leader, University of Cambridge, UK; CSO, Inivata Ltd. UK
Dr. Nitzan Rosenfeld is a recognized expert in cell-free DNA analysis and its application for non-invasive cancer genomics. Originally trained in Physics, Dr. Rosenfeld specialized in quantitative molecular biology, obtaining a Ph.D. from the Weizmann Institute of Science. In 2005 he joined Rosetta Genomics Ltd, where he was head of Computational Biology and led development of molecular tests that are commercially available for clinical use in oncology. Since 2009 he has been focusing on applications of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as a group leader at the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute (University of Cambridge). His research group pioneered the use of Next-Generation Sequencing of ctDNA, demonstrating its potential as a liquid biopsy, and produced seminal publications establishing molecular techniques for ctDNA analysis including whole exome, hybrid capture, and tagged-amplicon sequencing (TAm-Seq). In 2013 Dr. Rosenfeld was awarded the CRUK Future Leaders in Cancer Research prize, the British Association for Cancer Research Translational Research Award, and an ERC Starting Grant. In 2015 he was awarded the Foulkes Foundation Medal for outstanding achievements in medical science and significant impact on UK bioscience. In 2014, Dr. Rosenfeld and colleagues founded Inivata, to harness the emerging potential of circulating DNA analysis to improve testing and treatment for oncologists and their patients.
Abstract Title: Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA: pushing the limits for cancer applications
Cancer is driven by genomic alterations, and can evolve in response to selective pressures. Sampling of tumor material however is a limiting factor for both diagnostics and research. Circulating tumor DNA can be found in plasma and other body fluids, and with advanced genomic techniques it can be used as an effective source of information for oncology. Targeted molecular profiling tests of “liquid biopsies” in blood plasma are now entering clinical use to support treatment selection, and are emerging as an informative clinical research tool to track response to treatment, cancer progression and emergence of resistance to therapy. Wider-scale analysis can be used to study new drivers and mechanisms of resistance. In parallel, the specificity of genomic alterations makes these excellent markers to quantify cancer dynamics and disease burden. Improved methods and strategies can allow us to stretch the boundaries of analysis to detect smaller amounts of tumor DNA and to obtain more information from limited samples. These can be used to support an expanding range of applications for both earlier and later stage cancers.
Richard B. Lanman, MD
Chief Medical Officer, Guardant Health, Inc
Dr. Lanman was appointed as Chief Medical Officer of Guardant Health INC in 2014. Dr. Lanman earned his medical degree from Northwestern University - The Feinberg School of Medicine and complete his residency at the University of California San Francisco. Prior to joining Guardant Health, Dr. Lanman was chief medical officer for Veracyte where he successfully conducted several large multicenter clinical utility and validity studies in endocrinology and pulmonology. He led collaborations with key academic and community-based opinion leaders that led to broad managed care coverage for the Afirma™ thyroid cancer test. He has held CMO and Executive Vice President roles at several cardiovascular diagnostics companies, including diaDexus, Inc. and Atherotech. Earlier in his career, he served in various physician practice management roles. Dr. Lanman is also currently on the board of advisors for Compass Technology Partners.
Abstract Title: Lessons Learned from ctDNA NGS Testing in 25,000 Advanced Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice
Dr. Lanman will discuss the test performance requirements for a ctDNA predictive diagnostic, the importance of comprehensive genomic plasma testing covering all four major alteration classes, and the use of outcomes studies to validate low variant allele fractions and alteration classes where robust reference standards do not exist.
The primary clinical utility of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is as a predictive diagnostic for matched therapies in advanced cancers. Because tissue is required for histopathological classification, it cannot routinely replace tissue-based genotyping at initial diagnosis; however, it is indicated for use at disease progression (2nd line and higher) and also at diagnosis (1st line) for the 25%-50% of tissue biopsies that are quantity not sufficient (QNS) for genotyping or undergenotyped. Put simply, the clinical utility of ctDNA genotyping is inherent when it is used to obviate a repeat invasive tissue biopsy.
The utility of the test provides a guide to the diagnostic test performance characteristics required. As a predictive diagnostic, the critical performance criterion is high specificity, so that false positive results do not lead to prescription of matched therapies in a patient who will not benefit. As high sensitivity is difficult to achieve due to low concentrations of ctDNA, extant liquid biopsy hotspots tests cannot be used as rule-out tests. In addition to qualitative accuracy, ctDNA-based diagnostics must also demonstrate a high degree of quantitative accuracy for understanding whether resistance mutations are subclonal or truncal (and thus targetable). Lastly, all four major types of genomic alterations must be reported in order to capture the eleven somatic genomic alterations mentioned in NCCN guidelines as matched therapy targets.
Validation of ctDNA NGS versus tissue testing is challenged by spatial and tumor heterogeneity, where a needle biopsy may not capture actionable alterations not present in all lesions or parts of a lesion, or where archival tissue will not detect actionable alterations acquired under treatment pressure. Also, since reference standards for copy number amplifications and fusions are not robust and FDA CDx tests for point mutations and indels are of insufficient sensitivity, single-arm outcome studies with objective response endpoints will be required for validation for these situations